Do you prefer reading first-person or third-person narratives? Does it make a difference when the story is in a particular genre? Does the narrative point of view give the story a different feel for you?
I know I don’t need to detail for you what I mean here, but just in case:
- First-person: I dashed into the alleyway, gun drawn, and confronted the assassin.
- Third-person: He dashed into the alleyway, gun drawn, and confronted the assassin.
For a long time the general advice to novelists was to stick with third-person narration, and past tense only, please. First-person narration was for autobiographies and hard-boiled detective stories only, though I think you could find a number of examples in 19th- and early 20th-century literature (think H.G. Wells, for instance). However, a common narrative form of the age was to have a first-person narrator who was not in fact the main character of the story, or even very important to the story. This may seem strange to us today, but it allowed the author to slip into the role of fireside storyteller, relating events of some character he or she had met (if only in his or her imagination).
W. Somerset Maugham’s 1944 novel, The Razor’s Edge, was written in this manner: the author himself is the narrator, but is only barely tangential to the story of Larry Darrell and his friends. Writing in this manner gives the story a hint of “This is something that really happened,” while nevertheless remaining entirely fictional. On the other hand, it would seem to have the drawback of not allowing the storyteller (and thus the reader) to be present when the action occurs far away. In Maugham’s novel, Darrell travels to India and spends years searching for the meaning of life, yet we as the readers only learn of it when he returns to Europe and relates his tale to his friends — one of whom is the author/narrator. Perhaps Maugham didn’t want to emphasize the mysticism of Darrell’s eastern travels, instead keeping the focus on personal relationships more familiar to a western audience, but it was a disappointment for me to not be there when Larry sits on a mountaintop meditating.
Past advice notwithstanding, many great novels — and not just detective stories — are written in first-person. Such a style can make the action much more personal, as we are definitely inside the head of the narrator-protagonist. It can also allow for an unreliable narrator, a main character who relates events to us as they perceive them, or perhaps even as they wish to be perceived, and only later in the novel do we find out that the story’s “inner reality” is different.
But first-person narration also has its drawbacks. Classically, it restricts the author to telling the story from only a single point of view, though in modern times this “rule” has been broken quite successfully (see My Sister’s Keeper by Jodi Picoult for an example). It also classically has been taken as an indicator that the narrator survives to the end of the story, in order to be able to tell the tale, but again — spoiler alert! — see Picoult’s afore-mentioned tale.
Third-Person Deep PoV
It is possible to obtain that same “inside the protagonist’s head” feel with third-person narrative, using a technique usually called Deep Point of View (or Deep PoV). For example:
He raised the heavy gun, shakily pointing it at the assassin, who loomed large in the alley. The assassin laughed.
He raised the gun — how did it get so heavy? — and pointed it at the assassin. The man was huge! To make matters worse, the assassin merely laughed at his feeble effort.
Deep PoV attempts to have the reader identify with the character as much as first-person narration does, but still retain some of the detachment of third-person.
What about second-person narration? Is there such a thing? Indeed there is! Though I’m not sure I’ve ever seen it with past tense, so:
You dash into the alleyway, gun drawn, and confront the assassin.
As a writer, you will likely be told, over and over, never to write this way, that such a book will never sell.
Jay McInerney laughed all the way to bank after his debut novel, Bright Lights, Big City went bestseller. Yep, all second-person. Same for N.K. Jemison with her Hugo-award-winning novel, The Fifth Season. For a science fiction example, see Charles Stross and Halting State, plus its sequel, Rule 34.
Second-person narration is very hard to pull off, however. If not done exceptionally well, its very strangeness can be off-putting.
Past vs Present Tense
Having now mentioned tense, let’s dive into that. Again, traditionally, stories have been told in past tense — He dashed into the alleyway — giving it that feel of an oral tradition, related by elders around the campfire, of mythic deeds by mythic heroes of an ancient age. But in the past few decades, present tense novels have come into vogue. Granted, such writing has existed for some time: Ulysses by James Joyce, published in 1918, employs present-tense narration. Going back even farther, Charles Dickens used present tense for his 1852 serial, The Bleak House.
Still, throughout most of the 20th century, most novels were written in past tense. Lately, however, that seems to be changing. While still true — I think, as I don’t have a statistic on this handy — that while most novels today are in past tense, clearly an increasing number of them are coming out in present tense. This certainly seems prevalent with YA novels — The Hunger Games (Suzanne Collins), Divergent (Veronica Roth) — but is definitely not restricted to that genre. The second-person novels I mentioned earlier, for instance, are also present-tense novels. The Girl on the Train (Paula Hawkins), The 5th Wave (Rick Yancey), and, yes, infamously, Fifty Shades of Grey (E.L. James), are also present-tense novels. The list is quite long, really.
You will probably notice that many of these are also first-person narration. Certainly this isn’t universally true, but it feels more natural — to me, anyway — to couple present tense with first-person.
Future Tense and Stranger Things
What about future tense?
I admit, I’m not aware of any examples of novels written in future tense, and I have a hard time imagining flowing prose in such a style, at least in English.
He will dash into the alleyway, gun drawn…
Sounds more like a prophecy than a story.
Of course, we could go crazy with future perfect (He will have dashed…), future perfect progressive (He will have been dashing…), and so on, but you can see how cumbersome this quickly gets. Perfect, progressive, and perfect progressive modifiers can be applied to past and present tense as well, of course, but in all cases this starts to add a lot of words to describe an action.
Putting It All Together
So that was a long ramble, but why do I bring this up? If you’ve been following my work-in-progress, The Silence of Ancient Light, you’ll note that I’ve been writing (oh, there’s past perfect progressive!) in third-person past tense. However, you’ll also note that there is, so far, only one point-of-view character, Anna Laukkonnen. I think in the early scenes I managed to achieve some deep PoV with Anna, but as I look back on the later scenes, I sense that I’ve drifted a bit from this, which is something I’ll need to correct in the next draft.
But, if the story is entirely from Anna’s point of view, would it make more sense to change it to first-person narrative? I admit, I’m currently undecided on this point. I have written other stories in first-person, and I’ve generally found it to be a comfortable style for me. I am striving for that deep personal perspective, and for me that’s perhaps a little easier in first-person, but it doesn’t have to be that way.
As a reader, I enjoy books in both first- and third-person — and yes, I enjoyed The Fifth Season in second-person as well, though with Halting State I admit it took me a while to get used to it. So, I don’t have a strong preference one way or the other, but instead want to use the style that best lends itself to the tale I have to tell.
The vast majority of my writing has been traditional past tense, as well, but recently I’ve tried my hand at some present-tense writing, and I’ve found it can set a certain mood to a story that is sometimes appropriate, though not always. I’m not against it, though I’m not sure it’s what I want for Silence.
What do you think? What is your preference? What do you think would work best for Anna and Silence? If you’re a writer, what feels most natural to you?
header image credit: Stefan Keller (user:kellepics / pixabay.com) under Pixabay License
6 thoughts on “A Tense Point of View”
IN A NOVEL. i LIKE TO FEEL Ii AM THE ONE INVOLVED SO FIRST PERSON, i FEEL THE PAIN, THE THREATS. THE SUCCESSES, ETC SUBJECTIVE , MORE LIKE REALITY
IN A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT SOMETHING LIKE SCIENCE.Ii THINK 3RD PERSON IS MORE APPROPRIATE, BECAUSE i CAN STAND OUTSIDE AND OBSERVE HOW OTHERS COME TO CONCLUSIONS AND LEARN FROM THEM,. OBJECTIVE…. MORE LIKE A PLAY/REENACTMENT
IT IS POSSIBLE TO DO BOTH BY INTRODUCING CHARACTERS WHO ARE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE ACTION, WHILE THE MAIN CHARACTER IS 1ST PERSON….
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Linda. So, you’d advocate that “Silence” should be in 1st-person, then? Presumably from Anna’s point of view, since she has (so far) been my only PoV character.
Though, I must admit, I’ve been considering to have a handful of scenes from other PoVs. Specifically, I’m debating whether to tell the events of the hurricane from Jaci’s PoV in the camp on the atoll, or to leave it all a mystery until Anna and Laxmi find their way back. Assuming they find their way back, of course. When last we left them, Anna had blacked out for… ahem… reasons unknown, and, after all, nothing is certain.
But, as you say, while in the past it was traditional to have a 1st-person novel remain entirely in that perspective, and entirely from that narrator, these days it’s not that uncommon to have 1st-person narration for the main characters, but still intersperse scenes for other characters, usually but not always in 3rd-person. I would consider doing that.
First person is my favorite to read and write 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s two votes for 1st-person! I’m sensing a trend.
Interestingly, I think there’s been a revival of late of 1st-person narrative in science fiction. Much of the very early work in the genre was 1st-person (as was much other literature at the time), but in the middle and late twentieth century, I think SF took a strong turn toward 3rd-person dominance. In the last decade or perhaps two, though, more SF novels are coming out in 1st-person, though I’m not sure if they’re a majority at this time.
As I wrote above, I still like both, but I am leaning towards converting “Silence” into a 1st-person narrative in the 2nd draft.
Thanks for your comment! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just an aside, but I tried my hand at some 2nd-person present tense writing very recently, which you can read if you’re so inclined on my other blog site:
Not fiction, but just what the title implies: a eulogy for my recently-departed mother, and an attempt to write from her PoV.